Every conversational AI demo looks smooth. Then you build one. User asks "Show me top ROI pages." Simple, right? Until you realise: Which data source? How fresh? What if it's computing? How do you show progress? What if they ask something else while waiting?
This is where most AI projects stumble — in the gap between demo magic and production reality. After building agentic architecture since 2019, we've learnt that the secret isn't in the AI model or the backend systems. It's in the layer between them: the interface layer.
The hidden complexity of conversational AI
Building conversational AI that actually works means solving challenges that demos conveniently skip:
Intent is messy and contextual: "Show me performance" could mean traffic, conversions, ROI, or something entirely different based on previous conversation. Traditional chatbot architecture fails here because it treats each message in isolation.
Data lives in multiple states: Some answers come from cached analytics. Others need real-time computation. Some require calling external APIs. Users don't care — they just want answers. Your agentic architecture must handle this seamlessly.
Users expect impossible combinations: They want instant responses like Google AND deep analysis like a consultant. They want natural conversation AND precise data. They want to interrupt, change topics, go back to previous points — all while the system maintains perfect context.
Conversation must feel natural while orchestrating chaos: Behind a simple "Let me check that for you" might be five API calls, three data transformations, and complex state management. The user should never see this complexity.
Most teams discover these challenges after months of development. They couple conversation directly to processing, create blocking operations that freeze chat, and end up with a sophisticated system that feels clunky to use.
The interface layer: Your AI's orchestration brain
The interface layer is where intent becomes intelligence. It's the orchestration brain that sits between user conversation and your backend systems, handling the complex dance of understanding, routing, processing, and responding.
Think of it as a sophisticated air traffic controller. Planes (user intents) arrive from all directions, need routing to different gates (data sources), must avoid collisions (state conflicts), and passengers (users) expect smooth journeys regardless of weather (system complexity).
In our agentic AI architecture, the interface layer handles four core responsibilities:
Intent Classification: What does the user actually want? This goes beyond keyword matching to understanding context, history, and implicit needs.
Resource Routing: Where does this data live? Should we query existing analysis or trigger fresh computation? Which systems need to be involved?
State Management: What's the conversation context? What are user preferences? What operations are in progress? How do we maintain coherence across sessions?
Response Orchestration: How do we make technical operations feel conversational? When do we show progress? How do we handle errors gracefully?
Here's the crucial insight: the interface layer is deterministic code, not AI. The AI provides personality and natural language understanding. The interface provides reliability, performance, and scalability. This separation is what makes agentic architecture production-ready rather than demo-ready.
Intent classification: Beyond simple pattern matching
Understanding user intent in production requires nuance that simple pattern matching can't provide. When a user says "Show me my top pages," the meaning depends entirely on context.
Consider this real scenario from our agentic architecture:
User: "How's my site doing?"
This seemingly simple question triggers a complex decision tree in our interface layer:
- Check when we last analysed their site
- Evaluate data freshness thresholds
- Consider user's typical behaviour patterns
- Determine optimal response strategy
If data is less than 7 days old, we query our cache. If older, we offer a refresh. If missing entirely, we proactively trigger analysis. The user experiences a smooth conversation while the interface handles this complexity.
Our classification hierarchy in the agentic architecture works in three levels:
Explicit intents are direct commands or questions with clear patterns. "Run ROI analysis" or "Show conversion rates" leave little ambiguity. We handle these with deterministic routing.
Implicit intents depend on conversational context. "What about last month?" only makes sense if we know what metric we were discussing. The interface layer maintains this context across turns.
Composite intents require multiple actions. "Compare our performance to competitors and create an action plan" needs decomposition, sequencing, and result synthesis.
Here's how this works in practice:
const classifyIntent = (message, context) => {
// Explicit patterns first - fastest path
if (matchesPattern(message, ROI_PATTERNS)) {
return checkDataFreshness()
? { type: 'query', target: 'roi_analysis' }
: { type: 'command', action: 'refresh_roi' };
}
// Context-aware classification for follow-ups
if (context.lastIntent === 'roi_analysis') {
return interpretFollowUp(message, context);
}
// Complex intents need decomposition
if (hasMultipleActions(message)) {
return decomposeIntent(message, context);
}
// Fallback to LLM for ambiguous cases
return llmClassify(message, context);
};
This approach means 95% of intents route instantly through simple patterns, while edge cases still handle gracefully through AI fallback.
The CQRS pattern: Making agentic architecture feel instant
The Command Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) pattern transformed how we build conversational AI. Instead of treating all operations equally, we separate reads from writes — and this changes everything.
In traditional chatbot architecture, every request follows the same path. User asks question → system processes → user waits → response appears. This creates terrible user experience for complex operations.
Our agentic architecture uses CQRS to deliver both speed and depth:
Queries read from pre-computed data in milliseconds. When someone asks "What are my top ROI pages?", we're not calculating on the fly. We're retrieving results from our optimised read store, formatting them, and having our AI narrate findings. Total time: 2-3 seconds.
Commands trigger meaningful work asynchronously. When someone says "Run a fresh audit," we validate the request, queue the work, and return immediately with "I'll analyse your site now. This typically takes 2-3 minutes." The heavy lifting happens in the background while conversation continues.
This separation enables natural conversation flow:
// Query path - instant gratification
async function handleQuery(intent) {
const data = await cosmos.query(intent.target); // 50ms
const formatted = formatForDisplay(data); // 10ms
const narrative = await llm.narrate(formatted); // 2s
return { type: 'response', content: narrative, data: formatted };
}
// Command path - thoughtful acknowledgment
async function handleCommand(intent) {
const validation = validateCommand(intent);
if (!validation.valid) {
return { type: 'clarification', issue: validation.issue };
}
const job = await queue.push({
command: intent.action,
params: intent.params,
callback: updateConversation
});
return {
type: 'acknowledgment',
message: `I'll ${intent.friendlyAction} now. This usually takes ${estimateTime(intent)}.`,
jobId: job.id
};
}
The magic happens in data freshness logic. Our agentic AI architecture doesn't blindly serve stale data or unnecessarily refresh everything:
const handleDataRequest = async (intent) => {
const existing = await cosmos.query(intent.target);
const age = Date.now() - existing.timestamp;
if (age < 7 * DAYS) {
// Fresh - serve immediately
return {
data: existing,
narrative: "Here's your latest analysis..."
};
} else if (age < 14 * DAYS) {
// Stale - serve with option
return {
data: existing,
narrative: `I have analysis from ${daysAgo(age)} days ago. Should I refresh?`,
option: 'refresh'
};
} else {
// Expired - proactive refresh
await triggerRefresh(intent);
return {
narrative: "Your data is quite old. I'm running fresh analysis now..."
};
}
};
This pattern makes our conversational AI feel intelligent without being presumptuous. Users get instant responses when possible, transparency about data freshness, and control over expensive operations.
State management: Remembering across conversations
Great agentic architecture remembers. Not just the last message, but the entire relationship context. This is where many AI systems fall short — they treat each conversation as isolated when users expect continuity.
Our interface layer maintains state at multiple levels:
Session state tracks the active conversation. What intents have we handled? What cards are displayed? What operations are pending? This lives in Redis for millisecond access and automatic expiration.
User state persists preferences and patterns. Does this user typically want detailed analysis or executive summaries? Do they check ROI first or traffic? This shapes how we present information without explicit configuration.
Organisation state ensures team alignment. When one user runs an analysis, others see the same results. When strategies update, everyone works from consistent data.
Here's what we track in practice:
const conversationState = {
// Identity and context
userId: 'emma-123',
accountId: 'acme-corp',
sessionId: 'session-31789',
// Conversation memory
messageHistory: [...last20Messages],
lastIntent: 'roi_analysis',
lastDataAccessed: 'page_performance',
activeCards: ['roi-summary', 'quick-wins'],
// Async operations
pendingCommands: [{
id: 'audit-456',
type: 'full_site_audit',
status: 'processing',
progress: 0.6,
startTime: Date.now()
}],
// Learned preferences
preferences: {
detailLevel: 'summary-first',
refreshBehaviour: 'ask-before-refresh',
primaryMetrics: ['roi', 'conversion'],
communicationStyle: 'direct'
}
};
This state management enables seamless handoffs. A user starts an audit on Monday, closes their laptop, and returns Wednesday asking "What did you find?" Our agentic architecture loads context and responds naturally: "The audit I ran Monday found three major opportunities. Your About page has the highest potential..."
The interface layer also handles state conflicts gracefully. If multiple team members work simultaneously, we maintain conversation isolation while sharing underlying data. Updates propagate through event streams, keeping everyone synchronised without confusion.
Orchestrating complexity: When simple becomes compound
Real business questions rarely map to single operations. "Compare our performance to competitors and create a sprint plan" involves multiple data sources, analysis steps, and synthesis. This is where agentic architecture proves its worth.
Our interface layer decomposes complex intents into executable graphs:
const orchestrateComplex = async (intent) => {
// Decompose into atomic operations
const tasks = decomposeIntent(intent);
// ['fetch_our_metrics', 'fetch_competitor_data', 'run_comparison', 'generate_sprint']
// Build execution graph with dependencies
const executionPlan = {
parallel: [
{ id: 'our_data', task: 'fetch_our_metrics' },
{ id: 'comp_data', task: 'fetch_competitor_data' }
],
sequential: [
{
id: 'compare',
task: 'run_comparison',
depends: ['our_data', 'comp_data']
},
{
id: 'sprint',
task: 'generate_sprint',
depends: ['compare']
}
]
};
// Execute with progress updates
return executeWithUpdates(executionPlan, {
onProgress: (update) => {
notifyUser(update.friendlyMessage);
},
onError: (error) => {
return gracefulFallback(error);
}
});
};
Users experience this as a natural progression:
"I'll help you compare and plan. This needs a few steps..."
"✓ Retrieved your latest metrics"
"✓ Found competitor data for 3 key players"
"✓ Analysis complete — you're ahead on conversion, behind on traffic"
"✓ Sprint plan ready with 5 prioritised actions"
The key is progressive disclosure. We don't overwhelm with details but provide enough feedback to maintain engagement. Each update builds anticipation while demonstrating progress.
Making it feel human: The personality layer
Technical excellence means nothing if the experience feels robotic. Our agentic AI architecture injects personality at precise moments without compromising clarity.
Timing creates believability. Instant responses feel inhuman. Our interface adds calibrated delays:
const responseTimings = {
acknowledgment: 500, // "Let me check..."
simpleQuery: 1500, // Database lookups
complexQuery: 3000, // Multi-source analysis
thinking: 2000, // Before detailed responses
typing: (text) => Math.min(text.length * 20, 3000)
};
Variation prevents monotony. Nobody says the same thing repeatedly in natural conversation:
const acknowledgments = [
"Let me check that for you...",
"Looking into this now...",
"I'll pull that data...",
"One moment while I analyse..."
];
const progressUpdates = [
"Found something interesting...",
"This is looking promising...",
"Almost done with the analysis...",
"Nearly there..."
];
// Select randomly but avoid recent repeats
const getMessage = (pool, recentHistory) => {
const available = pool.filter(m => !recentHistory.includes(m));
return available[Math.floor(Math.random() * available.length)];
};
Context shapes tone. Our agentic architecture adapts based on situation:
- Urgent issues get direct, action-focused responses
- Exploratory questions receive thoughtful, option-rich replies
- Errors trigger empathetic, solution-oriented messages
- Success moments celebrate appropriately
This personality layer works because it enhances rather than obscures functionality. Users feel supported by a thoughtful strategist, not entertained by a chatbot trying too hard to be human.
Production lessons: What we learnt the hard way
Building agentic architecture that scales taught us expensive lessons. Here's what we discovered across thousands of hours of real usage:
Simple patterns beat clever engineering. We started with sophisticated intent classification using embeddings and semantic search. It was impressive but slow. Now, 95% of intents match simple regex patterns. The fancy AI handles edge cases, not common cases.
Most chat UI surfaces buttons for next actions — these can be detected automatically rather than needing LLM classification. When a user clicks "View ROI Analysis," that's an explicit intent that routes instantly. Save the AI for the genuinely ambiguous cases.
Explicit beats implicit every time. Users prefer clear confirmation over smart assumptions. "Should I refresh this data?" beats auto-refreshing. "I'll analyse these 3 pages" beats silently selecting them. Transparency builds trust.
Async-first from day one. Retrofitting asynchronous patterns is painful. Every operation should assume it might take time. This forces good architecture decisions early and prevents the "frozen chat" problem that plagues most chatbot architecture.
State grows faster than expected. Our initial 1KB state objects now average 15KB after six months of usage. Conversation history, user preferences, cached results — it all adds up. Plan for growth or face performance cliffs.
Test with real conversation logs. Synthetic test cases miss the messy reality of human communication. Users interrupt themselves, reference things ambiguously, change topics mid-sentence. Our test suite now includes 10,000 real conversation fragments.
Performance thresholds matter:
- Sub-100ms intent classification keeps conversation flowing
- 2-second response time maintains engagement
- 5-second progress updates prevent abandonment
- State over 20KB noticeably slows response time
These aren't theoretical insights — they're battle scars from building systems that handle millions of interactions.
Building your own interface layer
Want to implement these patterns? Here's a practical starting point for your agentic architecture:
Start with the essentials:
-
Map your top 10 intents — What do users ask most? Create simple patterns for these first.
-
Separate reads from writes — Even basic CQRS dramatically improves user experience.
-
Add state management — Start with session state. Add user preferences later.
-
Build in async patterns — Every operation should support background execution.
Technology choices that work:
- User interface: Next.js, React or similar - modern frameworks with great async support
- API interface: C#, Node.js or Python - all have excellent async capabilities
- Session state: Redis - millisecond access, automatic expiration
- Persistent state: Any document database - we use Cosmos DB
- Message queue: Azure Service Bus or AWS SQS
- Real-time updates: WebSockets or Server-Sent Events
Minimal implementation pattern:
class InterfaceLayer {
constructor(cosmos, redis, queue, llm) {
this.cosmos = cosmos;
this.redis = redis;
this.queue = queue;
this.llm = llm;
}
async handleMessage(message, sessionId) {
// Load context
const context = await this.redis.get(sessionId) || {};
// Classify intent
const intent = await this.classifyIntent(message, context);
// Route based on type
let response;
switch(intent.type) {
case 'query':
response = await this.handleQuery(intent, context);
break;
case 'command':
response = await this.handleCommand(intent, context);
break;
default:
response = await this.handleClarification(message, context);
}
// Update context
context.lastIntent = intent;
context.messageHistory = [...(context.messageHistory || []), message];
await this.redis.set(sessionId, context, 'EX', 3600);
return response;
}
async classifyIntent(message, context) {
// Try simple patterns first
for (const [pattern, handler] of this.patterns) {
if (pattern.test(message)) {
return handler(message, context);
}
}
// Fall back to LLM
return this.llm.classify(message, context);
}
}
This foundation scales to handle complex agentic AI architecture while remaining maintainable.
The future of agentic architecture
We're pushing boundaries with predictive orchestration in our agentic architecture. Instead of reacting to requests, we anticipate them:
Predictive caching analyses usage patterns. When users check traffic, they typically ask about ROI next. We pre-compute likely follow-ups during quiet periods.
Speculative execution starts work before confirmation. When someone views stale data, we begin refreshing in the background. If they request it, results arrive faster. If not, we quietly discard the work.
Cross-conversation intelligence identifies organisational patterns. If three team members ask similar questions, we proactively surface insights to others.
Learned orchestration optimises execution paths. Our system discovers that certain API calls can happen in parallel, that some users always want detailed data, that Fridays see sprint planning queries.
These aren't just concepts — we're testing them in production. Early results show 40% faster response times and 60% reduction in explicit refresh requests.
Making intent truly intelligent
Building conversational AI that handles complex business logic requires more than connecting an LLM to your database. The interface layer is where intent becomes intelligence — where messy human needs transform into precise system actions while maintaining natural conversation flow.
The patterns we've shared — from CQRS architecture to state management to personality injection — come from millions of real interactions. They're proven in production, not just promising in theory.
Whether you're architecting your own agentic AI architecture or evaluating platforms like our own, understanding these patterns is crucial for success. The difference between a demo and a product lives in this layer.
See how a Fortune 500's AI intelligence platform uses these patterns →
Want to go deeper?
Read our guide to conversational design →
Book a technical architecture discussion →
About the author: Our team has been pioneering AI architecture since 2019, working with Microsoft on Fortune 500's AI content intelligence platform. This article shares production lessons from building Katelyn our own AI and other enterprise AI systems that handle millions of interactions monthly.